Mat Performance Tables 2017

Multi academy trust performance measures 1 school types and characteristics information as published in the 2017 school performance tables.

Mat performance tables 2017.

Those with at least three schools that had results at either key stage 2 or key stage 4 as published in the 2017 school performance tables where 2. More than half of mats fell below the average for progress 8 performance measures last year despite a slight improvement on the year before. The government has today published its multi academy trust mat performance league tables based on 2017 exam results. Mat havering child left at school policy 2017 21.

5 not all schools that are able to teach pupils at the end of the key stage necessarily did so in 2017. Performance tables ofsted reports policies. Analysis on the performance of multi academy trusts mats. For example knowing a mat had a progress 8 score of 0 2 in 2018 and a score of 0 2 in 2019 tells you how the mat compared to the national average in those years but not whether its performance improved across years.

Mat performance measures. Number of 16 18 students included in 2019 mat performance measures applied general qualifications cohort. Number of 16 18 students included in 2019 mat performance measures academic qualifications cohort. Those schools had been with the mat for at least three academic years.

With the mat for at least 3 full academic years and have results in the 2016 school performance tables. Key stage 2 mat performance in 2017 current year measures table 1. Please take care when drawing conclusions about a mat s improvement or fall in performance based on progress 8 alone. Hat exclusion policy mat complaints policy 2019 20.

Schools or colleges covering 16 18 study in this mat s performance data.